What Happens Between People Matters

There is a simple idea at the heart of Relational Intelligence:

What happens between people matters.

We spend a great deal of time thinking about leadership as something an individual possesses. We talk about a leader's skills, judgment, experience, personality, emotional intelligence, communication ability, and decision-making.

All of those things matter.

But leadership does not happen inside a leader.

Leadership happens between people.

It happens in the conversation when an employee disagrees with a decision.

It happens when someone brings a concern to a leader and watches carefully to see how the leader responds.

It happens when expectations are unclear, when accountability is necessary, when trust has been damaged, and when two people have to find a way forward after a difficult interaction.

It happens in moments that may seem insignificant at the time.

And those moments accumulate.

A leader may forget a conversation that an employee remembers for years.

A response that seems perfectly reasonable to one person may change what another person is willing to say the next time.

Repeated interactions create expectations. Expectations influence behavior. Behavior affects subsequent interactions. Over time, relationships develop histories.

That means we cannot always understand organizational life by examining people individually.

Two highly capable people can have a poor relationship.

The same leader can have an excellent relationship with one employee and a difficult relationship with another.

The same words can have very different meanings depending on who says them, what has happened previously, the power difference between the people involved, and what each person has learned to expect from the other.

Something is happening between them.

That is the territory Relational Intelligence is intended to help us understand.

Relational Intelligence focuses on our capacity to recognize relationally important information, interpret what it may mean, decide how to respond, and act in ways that take account of both the immediate situation and the relationship in which it is occurring.

It does not mean that every interaction should be comfortable.

Effective leadership sometimes requires disagreement.

Sometimes it requires accountability.

Sometimes it requires saying no.

Sometimes it requires delivering news another person does not want to hear.

And sometimes it requires recognizing that a relationship cannot continue as it has.

Relational Intelligence is not about making everyone happy.

It is about becoming more capable of understanding what is happening between people while leadership is taking place.

That distinction matters because relationships do not reset after every conversation.

What happens today can influence what becomes possible tomorrow.

Trust can accumulate. So can distrust.

People can become more willing to speak—or less willing.

They can become more willing to disagree, ask for help, acknowledge mistakes, challenge assumptions, or raise concerns.

Or they can learn that doing those things carries relational consequences they would rather avoid.

Eventually, these experiences extend beyond individual relationships.

Patterns develop across teams and organizations. People learn what happens when they speak. They learn how disagreement is handled. They learn whether accountability includes dignity. They learn whether leaders listen when listening is difficult.

A relational environment begins to take shape.

This is why I believe relationships deserve far more attention in our understanding of leadership and organizational life.

Strategy matters.

Structure matters.

Technology matters.

Expertise matters.

But all of them ultimately have to move through human interaction.

And that brings us back to the deceptively simple proposition with which we began:

What happens between people matters.

Perhaps one of the most important questions a leader can ask, therefore, is not simply:

What am I trying to accomplish?

But also:

What is happening between us while we are trying to accomplish it?

Next
Next

AI Can Give Leaders Better Information. But Will It Help Them Change?